Give a child a fish…

Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.
-Chinese Proverb

I read somewhere once that children are redirected or told no on average every nine seconds. Now, I have no idea how this stat came to be, because how would you study that? But anyway, it’s an interesting thought nonetheless. Imagine being at work and having your boss tell you you’re doing it wrong or trying to show you how to do it better every nine seconds. I think most of us would go insane and/or quit pretty quickly.

We wanted to avoid having to be constantly saying no to Meredith, but more and more babyproofing seemed like the wrong direction to go too. We don’t have baby gates even though we have stairs, only a few of our outlets have the little safety things in them (and Meredith can pull them out easier than I can anyway, since I don’t have nails), our stereo equipment is at ground level, and we don’t have locks on our cupboard doors. I kept meaning to babyproof, I felt that not doing so was a recipe for disaster. But as time went on, it started to seem so unnecessary.

So how to avoid saying no while still keeping Meredith and our belongings safe and not excessively baby proofing? It’s actually really simple. We let her learn what to do while remaining nearby in case we’re needed. We make sure we’re very aware of where she is and what she’s doing, as well as anything around her that could be dangerous (or that she could be too rough with without meaning to).

The stairs are a perfect example. She started crawling at 6 months and was interested in the stairs right away. We let her experiment on them as much as she wanted and were right nearby in case of a fall, especially at first. And she did fall a few times, though she never hurt herself as we would catch her and comfort her if needed and then she would normally want to try again. We didn’t push her to learn it, or try and set her on the stairs every day, or move her arms and legs through the motions to try and teach her how, we just let her go at her own pace and figure it out on her own. She learned pretty quickly how to get up the stairs and rarely fell. (The video is of her around 6 1/2 months, but it’s not a great video because I’m spotting her while I film.) Around 8 months she figured out how to get down the stairs (again, on her own).

 

I think for me, the biggest problem with baby proofing is that it doesn’t teach a child how to handle a situation should the baby proofing fail. What if you forgot to put the baby gate up but assumed it was there? Or your child can pull outlet covers out? Or you left your glasses on the table where your child can reach them? I’m of the opinion that it is much safer to rely on your child and yourself to keep your child safe than to rely on devices that could be forgotten, break, or fail in some other way.

Obviously, this doesn’t mean I would give Meredith a knife and point her at an outlet and let her see what happens. And there are times when “no” or redirection are definitely appropriate. But telling her she can’t touch our DVD player when she sees us using it frequently just makes it seem even more desirable to her. Instead, letting her play with the buttons while being supervised, explaining that food and drinks shouldn’t be near it, and helping her discover how it works keep it safe while honoring her desire to participate in something she sees us doing. Now we can ask her to turn it on or off for us if she’s nearby, and she has figured out the volume controls as well. My parents tell stories about sandwiches ending up in their VCR. We have shown Meredith how to put DVD’s in the player and she doesn’t seem to have any desire to put anything else in there. My belief is that kids do things like putting sandwiches in VCR’s because they see us putting things in and want to do what we do, not because they’re trying to cause trouble or make us mad.

This can be applied to all sorts of situations. I feel it’s far better to let children explore and learn at their own pace, giving them information or guidance only as needed. In doing so, I’ve discovered that she’s surprisingly gentle with books, careful with dishes, and she will even clean up after herself after playing with water on the floor. There are things, like my expensive camera, that I don’t want her playing with. But if I leave my camera in her reach and she finds it, even then I don’t immediately wrench it out of her grasp. I’ll ask her for it, and often she will hand it to me and go on with something else. The times when she really wants to play with it, I will sit her on my lap and let her put the lens cap on and off or press some buttons while I watch, and then when she’s bored I put it up out of the way and make a mental note to myself not to leave it in her reach again.

When my instinct is to say no or stop something Meredith is doing, I try and ask myself why and then look for ways to allow her to continue while relieving my own worries (or, in some cases, just realizing that my concerns are a gut reaction that may not even be true). Is it because I don’t want her to make a mess? If I’m really adverse to cleaning up a mess at that time, maybe I could relocate what she’s doing to the bathtub or into the sink. (Though honestly, mostly I don’t mind the messes at all.) Am I worried she will hurt herself? Is there some way I can make it safer? etc.

Helping children discover how to handle themselves in various situations is better in the long run than just trying to avoid those situations until some abitrary age in the future when the children are “old enough”. And when they’re allowed to explore and shown how to safely use these things, it means they’re less likely to damage something or hurt themselves later on when faced with a similar situation.

Related posts:

  1. La Teta: to give the breast is to give life
  2. Thoughts on Chores
  3. A video & an addendum
  4. Punishments and Rewards
  5. Etsy's Mothering Street Team Spring Fling Give Away

4 comments to Give a child a fish…

  • Great post. Of course you know that I agree. I sometimes still think of Meredith as that little baby in the video! She’s so adorable.

    When I first started reading you post I thought we were on the same weird wave length in that I just finished writing a post on “NO!” but it wasn’t the same at all. I also have a post almost ready to publish on how emphasis is put on the wrong things in parenting, like baby proofing. So much effort is put into telling kids “no” or disempowering them when less effort could be put forth to help them learn on their own and with guidance to understand how things work.

    If you allow children the room, they are surprisingly capable a figuring out and understanding these things quickly.

  • Ha that’s funny! I actually started it out as a post on “No” but it evolved. I was going to rewrite it and try to keep it more on topic but decided I liked how it turned out in the end. Plus it’s more honest of my thoughts anyway when I post it without editing too much. :)

    But yes, it always amazes me when I see other parents spending so much time trying to keep something away from their kids, yet it takes so little time to show them how to use something safely. I actually prefer to have other kids in my house who come from non-babyproofed houses as I find they are way more respectful and gentle with our things than a kid who isn’t given much freedom to explore these things.

  • I like how your post turned out too. It would have been funny to see two of the same posts at the same time. Hey, I did that with Paxye one time. Ha.

    We don’t have any baby proofing here at all so I agree that it’s easier to have kids that are used to the freedom to open doors and use things. Otherwise the freedom is a novelty that doesn’t wear off fast enough! Ha. Not only that but the parents are usually freaked out if they’re near anything (my stove, plugs, stairs, knives…) and that makes me jumpy too! It’s like having a heart attack every 10 minutes when the parent jumps up and freaks out. Very hard to relax and enjoy a visit like that. The kids also seem to be more ill at ease.

  • Haha, your comment made me laugh just imagining that. I agree though, it would make it much harder to enjoy a visit in that case. The other side of the story of course is when we go visiting and the host/hostess has breakable things within reach, or items they don’t want Meredith to look at, and expect us to be constantly trying to divert her attention away. It’s not fair to her and again makes the visit more stressful for everyone. I appreciate when we’re visiting somewhere if people put anything breakable or that they really are worried about out of reach, and otherwise if Meredith is looking at something and I’m right there with her, to trust that we won’t damage anything!

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

“It is as true now as it was then that no matter what tests show, very little of what is taught in school is learned, very little of what is learned is remembered, and very little of what is remembered is used. The things we learn, remember, and use are the things we seek out or meet in the daily, serious, nonschool parts of our lives.”
~ John Holt

Photobucket